Indoor Harvest Corp (INQD)

[ccsykes]

It was a transfer of assets as part of a divorce settlement, it had nothing to do with “child support”.

Not really sure what that has to do with the issue at hand, which is a promotion using old information to mislead investors and the public. Seems more like a weak attempt to smear.

It’s fascinating you are able to find something like that, but seemingly unable to find all the other disclosures which would easily suggest the information being promoted is no longer applicable.